Think again of Trumps initiation of his campaign with the idea of the wall, and calling those who break through the wall rapists and murderers.
They say Putin and his advisers are also keenly aware that, even as she executed Obamas reset policy with Russia, Clinton took a harder line toward Moscow than others in the administration.Associated Press articles: Copyright 2016 The Associated Press.Intelligence sources emphasize to NBC News that there is no evidence that Donald Trump collaborated behind the scenes with Putin or the Russians.At a conference in Lithuania, Clinton issued a biting statement saying that the Russian people deserve to have their voices heard and their votes counted, and that means they deserve fair, free transparent elections and leaders who are accountable to them.(Later, on the floor of parliament, Gillard delivered a takedown of Abbotts behavior that became known as the misogyny speech and turned her into a global celebrity.).A business tycoon who vigorously inserted himself in the imaginations of the dispossessed as the foremost exponent of birtherism surely cannot be entirely beholden to the polite elites, can he?The Trump alliance desires to remake the world in their own image, just as the class representing neoliberal globalization has insisted on doing.And compare it to Clintons opening gambit of giving identifiable personalities to the clear winners in the transnational race to acquire and embody capital, paraded stylish home and gifts one after the other in her first campaign commercial.On arrival in the Obama administration in 2009, at a moment.S.-Russian tensions over Putins 2008 invasion of the Republic of Georgia, Clinton was tasked with implementing Obamas reset of relations with Moscow, an attempt to collaborate on areas of common interest even while."I dont think anybody thinks that youre wrong he said of the NBC News report.One could speculate that this is his moment for payback.In this election campaign, whoever names the empire of the market wins (Trump, or Sanders had he been able to overcome the barriers erected by the Democratic party and whoever hides its name (Clinton loses.(Gillard too was derided as a menopausal monster.).But theyre sending her a message that they are a power to be reckoned with and can mess with her at will, so she had better take them seriously.Thislike the other deals in death that the market fails to nameis an assertion of independence from the market.Clinton, because of her disembodied identity in the placeless global economy, cannot make a movement toward the direction of reality, because the equations would falter, the math would be off, the logic would be unsustainable.ButI do not want to claim for a minute that Trump can represent anything other than the further strengthening of neoliberal capitalism, both domestically and globally.James Stavridis when asked by NBC News about the level of the administrations response.Now consider, in the face of these three competing tendencies, the markets pure victory; because all three games are being played out on its terms, it is the preordained winner.Are these rallies, Trumps and Sanderss, aesthetic spectacles, or are they radical politics?At least thats the implication of the view among some cybersecurity experts that Russia was behind the recent hack of the Democratic National Committees email server, which has sowed confusion and dissent at the Democratic National Convention and undercut Clintons goal of party unity.
The market, I would dare to assert, is quite happy at the failure of the state to contend with racism.
The maneuverings of the Clinton Foundation, in the popular imagination, are as arcane as the colossal daily transactions on the worlds financial exchanges.
(You know the routine: Shes not a strong leader.